What the future might hold for DEI amid US challenges

In Union County, South Carolina, the cotton mills that once sustained the economy and offered jobs have vanished over time. Today, this area is designated as a “food desert,” indicating that numerous inhabitants reside a considerable distance from the nearest supermarket. Observing this problem, community non-profit leader Elise Ashby initiated a project in 2016. She partnered with local farmers to deliver affordable boxes of fresh fruit and vegetables across the county, which has a demographic where nearly 30% of the population is Black and approximately 25% are living below the poverty line.

At first, Ms. Ashby financed the project using her own savings and minor grants. But in 2023, her work gained substantial support as the Walmart Foundation—the charitable arm of one of the country’s largest companies—awarded her organization more than $100,000 (£80,000). This funding was included in a larger $1.5 million initiative designed to assist “community-based non-profits led by people of color.”

“It brought me to tears,” she confessed. “It was one of those instances when you understand that someone genuinely recognizes and appreciates your efforts.”

Only two years prior, initiatives like this received widespread support from leading corporations throughout the United States, as the nation grappled with systemic racism after the 2020 murder of George Floyd, a Black individual who lost his life beneath the knee of a police officer in Minneapolis.

However, numerous corporations are now withdrawing from these commitments. In November, Walmart shared plans to end certain diversity efforts, with the closure of its Center for Racial Equity, which had played a key role in financing Ms. Ashby’s grant, among them.

Companies like Meta, Google, Goldman Sachs, and McDonald’s have taken similar steps, indicating a wider corporate retreat from diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs.

This transition signifies a significant cultural change, influenced partly by concerns about legal disputes, regulatory oversight, and backlash on social media—pressures intensified by the current U.S. president.

Since assuming office in January, Donald Trump has vigorously attempted to dismantle DEI programs, promoting a revival of “merit-based opportunity” within the United States. He has directed the federal government to abolish DEI initiatives and commence inquiries into private companies and educational establishments suspected of participating in “illegal DEI practices.”

During the initial months of his second term, the Department of Veterans Affairs shut down its DEI offices, the Environmental Protection Agency put almost 200 civil rights staff on paid leave, and Trump replaced the nation’s top military general—a Black man—after his defense secretary had previously implied he should be dismissed due to his ties with “woke” DEI policies.

At first sight, it might appear that the U.S. has forsaken efforts to better outcomes for racial and identity groups historically marginalized. However, some specialists propose that these efforts might continue, perhaps under alternative names that better align with the evolving political environment of a country that has recently elected a leader devoted to opposing “woke” policies.

The Roots of the Backlash

Initiatives similar to DEI first gained traction in the U.S. during the 1960s, in reaction to the civil rights movement, which aimed to extend and safeguard the rights of Black Americans.

Originally termed as “affirmative action” and “equal opportunity,” these initiatives were designed to address the enduring effects of slavery and the institutionalized discrimination imposed by Jim Crow laws.

As social justice movements grew to include women’s rights, LGBTQ+ advocacy, and racial and ethnic diversity, the language associated with these endeavors expanded to cover “diversity,” “equity,” and “inclusion.”

In the realm of corporations and government bodies, DEI initiatives primarily concentrated on recruitment practices, portraying diversity as a financial benefit. Proponents claim that these programs tackle inequities across different communities, even though the focus has traditionally been on racial equity.

The push for DEI surged in 2020 amid the Black Lives Matter protests and increasing demands for social change. Walmart, for instance, pledged $100 million over five years to establish its Center for Racial Equity. Wells Fargo appointed its first chief diversity officer, while companies like Google and Nike already had similar leadership roles in place. Following these changes, S&P 100 companies created over 300,000 new jobs, with 94% of them going to people of color, according to Bloomberg.

Nonetheless, as rapidly as these initiatives grew, a conservative backlash arose.

Stefan Padfield, the executive director of the conservative think tank National Center for Public Policy Research, contends that DEI programs inherently separate individuals based on racial and gender differences.

In recent times, critics have amplified claims that DEI efforts—initially intended to fight discrimination—are themselves discriminatory, especially against white Americans. Training workshops that emphasize “white privilege” and systemic racial bias have faced significant criticism.

The foundation of this opposition originates from conservative pushback against critical race theory (CRT), an academic concept positing that racism is intricately woven into American society. Gradually, efforts opposing CRT in education broadened into wider campaigns aiming to penalize “woke corporations.”

Social media accounts like End Wokeness and conservative personalities like Robby Starbuck have leveraged this sentiment, focusing on corporations for their DEI efforts. Starbuck has asserted accountability for policy changes at firms like Ford, John Deere, and Harley-Davidson after highlighting their DEI programs to his digital audiences.

One of the most visible victories for this movement came in spring 2023, when Bud Light faced widespread backlash for partnering with transgender influencer Dylan Mulvaney. Calls to boycott the brand and its parent company, Anheuser-Busch, resulted in a 28% decline in Bud Light sales, according to a Harvard Business Review analysis.

Another significant juncture came in June 2023, when the Supreme Court decided that race could no longer be a consideration in university admissions, effectively overturning decades of affirmative action practices.

This verdict questioned the legality of corporate DEI policies. In the wake of the ruling, Meta notified its employees that “the legal and policy landscape surrounding DEI has shifted,” shortly before revealing the discontinuation of its own DEI programs.

Corporate Withdrawal: A Matter of Authenticity

The swift reversal of DEI initiatives among large corporations prompts questions regarding the genuineness of their dedication to workforce diversity.

Martin Whittaker, CEO of JUST Capital—a non-profit that surveys Americans on workplace issues—believes that many firms initially adopted DEI efforts to “appear favorable” following the Black Lives Matter movement, rather than from a true dedication to change.

Nevertheless, not all corporations are succumbing to political and legal pressures. A report by the conservative think tank Heritage Foundation indicated that although DEI programs seem to be diminishing, “nearly all” Fortune 500 firms still incorporate DEI pledges within their official declarations. Furthermore, Apple shareholders recently voted to preserve the company’s diversity initiatives.

Public opinion on DEI remains divided. A survey by JUST Capital suggests that support for DEI has waned, but support for related issues—such as fair pay—remains strong. Similarly, a 2023 Pew Research Center survey found that a majority (56%) of employed adults still believe that workplace DEI efforts are beneficial.